Support Our Mission
Read Our Latest Edition
BYLINE TIMES IMPACT: Find out about the changes you made happen
Three referrals to Britain’s Prevent programme were closed before 17-year-old Axel Rudakubana stabbed three children to death at a Taylor Swift-themed dance workshop in Southport in July 2024.
The killings laid bare systemic failures in how the British state detects and responds to individuals showing warning signs of mass violence.
Between 2019 and 2021, Rudakubana was referred to Prevent by his schools three separate times. Teachers warned about his interest in weapons, mass killings and terrorist attacks.
Yet none of the referrals progressed to Channel, the programme through which agencies assess individuals and coordinate support. The subsequent learning review identified premature closure and failures to gather information. Rudakubana lacked a clear political motive, and officers treated his vulnerabilities as matters for other services without adequately assessing the cumulative danger.
These failures were examined by the then interim Independent Prevent Commissioner, Lord David Anderson of Ipswich, whose July 2025 report highlighted the difficulty the Home Office’s counter-terrorism programme faces in responding to warning signs of mass violence that do not fit a clear political ideology.
In the years following 11 September 2001, at least 4.5 million people died in post-9/11 war zones from fighting or its indirect consequences, according to a 2023 estimate by Brown University’s Costs of War project.
In Britain, this war opened up a domestic front with the establishment of Prevent in 2003 – a flagship programme designed to identify individuals at risk of radicalisation and provide early intervention. Home Office funding across Prevent-related units reached £49.1 million in 2020–21, according to the independent review published in 2023.
From its inception, Prevent focused exclusively on Islamist terrorism, with early local authority funding allocated according to the size of the local Muslim population. Its remit was broadened in 2011 to include all forms of terrorism.
The British approach to counter-terrorism has continued to place considerable emphasis on whether an extremist is “Islamist” or “extreme right-wing”. But that tidy taxonomy is not enough.
According to official Prevent data, 18% of referrals in England and Wales in 2023–24 involved “conflicted ideology”, while 36% involved vulnerability but no identified ideology or counter-terrorism risk. Referrals are concerns raised for assessment, not confirmed terrorist threats.
As MI5 Director General Ken McCallum said in October 2024, straightforward labels “don’t fully reflect the dizzying range of beliefs and ideologies we see”.
Alongside established ideological threats, the British state is confronting “salad-bar” extremism – where lone actors pick and choose from an online smorgasbord of misogynist forums, violence-fixation gore communities, gaming platforms and subcultures glorifying US school shootings.
Radicalised in a digital dark, these individuals are among those who cannot be fully understood through current approaches to counter-terrorism.
Prevent’s guidance has recognised people without fixed ideologies for years. But Anderson’s report identified significant inconsistency in how cases involving a fascination with extreme violence progress through the system.
Receive the monthly Byline Times newspaper and help to support fearless, independent journalism that breaks stories, shapes the agenda and holds power to account.
SUBSCRIBE TODAY
We’re not funded by a billionaire oligarch or an offshore hedge-fund. We rely on our readers to fund our journalism. If you like what we do, please subscribe.
Proposals following Southport include a new offence targeting preparations for mass killings without a terrorist motive, put forward by Jonathan Hall, the independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, in March 2025. His review argued against broadening the de…