Support Our Mission
Read Our Latest Edition
BYLINE TIMES IMPACT: Find out about the changes you made happen
The Green Party of England and Wales is at loggerheads over how to respond to the war in Iran, with a well-organised campaign calling for an end to economic sanctions on the regime and opposition to the designation of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a foreign state-backed threat.
Two competing motions on Iran are being debated ahead of the party’s autumn conference.
One, A93, has 106 named backers on the Green Party members’ portal and is supported by Greens for Palestine.
It calls on the British Government to “pursue diplomatic normalisation with Iran”, to “campaign for the lifting of broad-based economic sanctions” and to “oppose the proscription or designation of Iranian state institutions, including the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)” on the grounds that “such measures are counterproductive, undermine diplomacy, close channels for engagement, and reduce opportunities for mediation and peacebuilding”.
Since the Green Party’s conference is sovereign and binding, passing it would bring party policy into conflict with the position of most of its MPs. Four Green MPs recently backed a Liberal Democrat amendment calling for the IRGC to be banned more quickly than under the Government’s own plans.
Receive the monthly Byline Times newspaper and help to support fearless, independent journalism that breaks stories, shapes the agenda and holds power to account.
SUBSCRIBE TODAY
We’re not funded by a billionaire oligarch or an offshore hedge-fund. We rely on our readers to fund our journalism. If you like what we do, please subscribe.
The amendment, which fell, would have required the Home Secretary to bring forward regulations designating the IRGC as a state threat within one month of the Act passing, but it was defeated. Siân Berry (Brighton Pavilion), Carla Denyer (Bristol Central, by proxy), Adrian Ramsay (Waveney Valley) and Hannah Spencer (Gorton and Denton) backed the push. Ellie Chowns (North Herefordshire) has no vote recorded.
The anti-proscription motion was tightened on 7 July to oppose the designation mechanism specifically. Six days later, on 13 July, the Government designated the IRGC as a state threat and banned support for the group. The motion contains no reference to IRGC activity in the UK. Several British-Iranians appear to back the motion, with one writing on the members’ forum that relatives cannot obtain important medicines under Western sanctions.
The Government accuses IRGC proxies of targeting dissident journalists on British soil and supporting attacks on Jewish communities, including the arson attack on Jewish community ambulances in Golders Green on 23 March.
Against that motion sits A99, “Justice, Not War, For Iran”, written by British-Iranian members. It opposes US and Israeli military action while calling for Magnitsky-style sanctions on named individuals and to “financially proscribe” the IRGC.
Incorporating concerns from some members about free speech, it also backs repealing “s11-13 of the Terrorism Act and the National Security Act” to “protect freedom of speech and Association in the UK”, in a nod to members in prison or facing court for allegedly supporting the banned group Palestine Action. It has, at the time of writing, 55 supporters against A93’s 106.
Backers of A99 cite a figure from the Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA) of more than 53,000 arrests made by the Iranian state in January alone, including hundreds of children. On 21 January 2026, Iran’s own Supreme Council of National Security issued a statement saying 3,117 people were killed during protests against the regime.
SIGN UP TO EMAIL UPDATES
A93’s proposer, Dr Ashok Kumar, did not answer specific questions from this outlet, including whether he believes the IRGC has directed or supported attacks on UK soil. But he said in a statement: “Britain has no business lecturing anyone about violence in t…