Support our mission to provide fearless stories about and outside the media system
Packed with exclusive investigations, analysis, and features
SUBSCRIBE TODAY
As they gather in Bournemouth for their annual conference, it is worth reminding ourselves that life for Liberal Democrats is relentlessly tough. You’re either ignored, despite moving from a total of MPs that barely broke double figures to over 70, or once in a very blue moon you might get to share power but are eviscerated as the junior partner who take the blame for everything that’s unpopular and gain none of the plaudits for what the public actually like.
If anything, it is the incredible tenacity of the Liberal Democrats that shines through. “Great deeds are won,w” wrote Samuel Johnson, “not by brute strength but by perseverance”.
In normal times the ebb and flow of Liberal Democrat support with a gentle uptick in its trend vote over the last few decades would be good enough just to stay in the game. But these are not normal times. The economy has not functioned effectively since the global crash. Living standards are in decline. The environmental and nature crisis start to engulf us all. Brexit, much to the dismay of Liberal Democrats in particular, looks unlikely to be reversed anytime soon. Many seem to be giving up on a political system that is liberal and democratic. 200,000 people marched through our capital demanding a different kind of liberty – the liberty to go back and to exclude, to be closed and not open. And coming from the USA is powerful and resourceful ways of pushing for an explicitly ‘post-liberal’ future.
In all this maelstrom what does it mean to be a liberal, where is the centre and can it hold, indeed should it hold? If we add in the conundrum of a party whose beating heart is essentially socially liberal, how does that centre left stance square with a now centre right facing electorate or former Conservative blue wall seats?
EXCLUSIVE
Whose Party? Your Party Backers in Call to ‘Democratise’ Left-Wing Group as Corbyn and Sultana Clash Over ‘Sexist Boys Club’
As Corbyn-Sultana tensions explode into the public arena, a new group is mobilising members to demand a ‘genuine say’ in the new party’s direction
Josiah Mortimer
None of this is easy. Ed Davey conjured an incredible result out of a first past the post system designed purposely to marginalise his party. And 70 is way better than 10. But the standing, the voice and the influence of the Liberal Democrats has not changed dramatically. Some of this isn’t their fault but that of the system. Labour have a huge majority, although cracks are starting to appear like the recent revolt on disability benefit payments. And the media of course play to the Farage gallery and it’s infuriating.
But given the existential threats facing a country that is still just a liberal democracy, where are the big ideas, the big thinking and the policy positions that speak to a bigger story coming from in the Liberal Democrats? The tensions between what their MPs and activists believe, and what their voters want are apparent. The party is against putting VAT on school fees and taxing farmers more. They rail against water companies failing their customers but refuse to back the logical step of putting this essential utility into the hands of the public. This is real raw politics. And it’s tough.
The game it seems is largely not to offend anyone in the hope that seats won won’t be lost and in the event voters hand the country a balanced parliament then the game is back on. The polls suggest this is more than a possibility, but with more than three years to go frankly anything could happen and probably will. In the meantime, what can the party do to stake out more robust terrain, while maintaining that difficult balancing act between principle and electoral pragmatism?
First the Liberal Democrats must set out the moral and intellectual case for liberalism as it comes under sustained attack from the post liberals. What…